Medicaid to Reintroduce Exception Reviews
Pete Van Runkle
Exception reviews of SNF RUG scores, authorized by Ohio law when the state originally switched to a RUG-based case-mix payment system, fell out of favor with the Department of Medicaid (ODM) a number of years ago because the resources devoted to recapturing dollars by lowering centers’ case-mix scores did not generate an adequate return on investment. With the change to RUG IV, however, ODM apparently has become suspicious of MDS coding by SNFs. ODM recently released a request for information (RFI) for a contractor to re-start exception reviews. ODM previously utilized agency staff to do them. ODM follows in the footsteps of the Department of Developmental Disabilities, which began conducting exception reviews of ICF/IID assessment two years ago, with somewhat controversial results. The ODM RFI calls for responses by October 26, 2016, but does not specify when the exception reviews will begin. The RFI gives some idea of what ODM has in mind:
It is expected the MDS exception review process would include MDS-trained clinical staff to evaluate risk factors such as: 1) Clinical inconsistencies, 2) RUG distribution outliers; 3) Significant quarterly Case Mix Index (CMI) changes; 4) Presence of specified software issues by State and Nursing facility providers; 5) RUG data fields; 6) Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Quality Measures; 7) statewide data comparisons; rehabilitation levels; and 8) results of prior MDS reviews and other risk factors.
Exception reviews are governed by a set of statutes and rules that date back to the original exception review program. ODM is responsible for taking any action against a provider’s rate resulting from the exception review findings, and due process is required. The rules also spell out thresholds for findings and payment take-backs.
Processing of Pro-rated Patient Liability; Unprocessed 9401s
Diane Dietz
In a call this morning with the Ohio Department of Medicaid (ODM), it was acknowledged that Ohio has seen a slowness across the board with County Departments of Jobs and Family Services (CDJFS) processing all facets of Medicaid applications under the new Ohio Benefits system. Some of the issues surround the manual processing of patient liability and pro-rated patient liability while other involve enhanced training. ODM reaffirmed that upon the death of an individual, the 9401 is to go to the county and they are to enter the date of death into Ohio Benefits and manually prorate patient liability. Should you experience a significant delay in the prorated patient liability appearing in MITS, please send a note toNFStay@medicaid.ohio.gov and they will attempt to intercede. ODM also indicated that they are requesting additional resources to assist with processing the overwhelming number of “thousands and thousands” of unprocessed 9401s that they did not anticipate prior to the August 1st go live date for Ohio Benefits.They remain committed to getting these processed as soon as possible and appreciated our patience. Please continue to send unprocessed 9401s toNFStay@medicaid.ohio.gov.
QMBs/SLMB/QIs in Ohio Benefits
Diane Dietz
OHCA has reported to ODM continued issues with Qualified Medicare Beneficiaries (QMBs), Specified Low-Income Medicare Beneficiaries (SLMBs) and Qualifying Individuals (QIs) being entered in Ohio Benefits so nursing facilities can bill for Medicare co-insurance and when applicable, eventual long term care services. Under the old 9401 process, nursing facilities were required to notify a county of all admissions, including an admission of a QMB/SLMB/QI, so the beneficiary could be entered into CRIS-E and nursing facilities could bill for Medicare co-insurance. Should the QMB/SLMB/SI beneficiary end of staying long term (now defined as 90 days), ABD SIL-based Medicaid would be explored. Under the new 9401 process, we believe this population was inadvertently overlooked. Due to the fact that QMBs/SLMBs/QIs already have open Medicaid cases, no-one classified them as a new Medicaid applicant for which NFs are required to complete a 9401 and send it to their local PAAs. As a result, they were not being entered into Ohio Benefits, and nursing facilities were not able to bill for Medicare co-insurance. We have brought this to the attention of ODM and while ODM indicated they are preparing a guidance for these beneficiaries, we believe strongly the guidance will result in: 1) the nursing facility sending a 9401 to the PAAs signifying they are new to entering a long term care facility and 2) marking the box indicating the facility is seeking a LOC exemption because they are in a Medicare Part A stay. Certainly if you wish to add to the comment field that fact that you believe these individuals are QMBs/SLMBs/QIs, that would be helpful too. We hope the new guidance and further training on this population will result in the PAAs entering them quickly into Ohio Benefits so nursing facilities can bill for Medicare co-insurance. We anticipate the guidance coming soon, and will discuss how to communicate should these QMBs/SLMBs/QI need to stay long term and have their Medicare explore against the ABD SIL-based Medicaid criteria for institutional, nursing facility services.
Clarification of When LTC Detail Screen Needs Completed for Processing of Medicaid Applications
Diane Dietz
ODM has acknowledged that there is confusion over when a LTC detail screen needs to be completed in Ohio Benefits before county caseworkers can process new Medicaid applications. For MAGI cases and base Medicaid ABD cases (ABD beneficiaries with a monthly income limit of 75% of FPL or $743), a LTC detail screen, which includes a LOC, is not needed for the counties to technically complete the Medicaid financial eligibility application. Please note, nursing facilities still need an approved LOC to bill for our room and board services; however, to complete MAGI and ABD base Medicaid financial eligibility cases, one is technically not needed. Only higher-income ABD beneficiaries who are evaluated for Medicaid against the institutionalized, special income level (SIL) ABD criteria are required to have a level of care detail screen, which includes an approved LOC, prior to completing the Medicaid application. ODM believes that many of the delays reported by OHCA and our members, whereby we have reported counties telling providers that they cannot complete the Medicaid application because the LOC detail screen is not complete, is due to this confusion. OHCA will continue to follow this issue and report accordingly to ODM.
QIT Opt Out Letter Issued by AHS
Diane Dietz
OHCA has reported to ODM issues surrounding a new “Opt Out of Qualified Income Trust” form that is being issued by Automated Health System (AHS) when a family chooses not to engage the services of AHS to establish a QIT but rather communicates the nursing facility is assisting them. The form implies that the family is opting out a completing a QIT, as opposed to opting out of needing the services of AHS, which is causing confusion and undo stress on families. OHCA communicated our concerns to ODM. ODM did confirm that they approved this form as a way to monitor AHS and ensure families were receiving the needed information about establishing a QIT. ODM did acknowledge that the wording on the form was misleading and at minimum, needing correcting. However, ODM went on to say that they are reevaluating this entire process and feel some verbal acknowledgement that a family did not need AHS services would probably suffice. Please stay tune as more information becomes available.